/ UX/UI DESIGN ·Part of the Web Engine

Design that ships.
Systems that scale.

UX/UI Design isn’t decoration. It’s the conversion infrastructure between your product and your buyer. We build token-driven design systems, ship pixel-honest components, and tune every interaction against the metric that pays the bills.

Get a Design AuditFree UX Review
/ DESIGN SYSTEM · TOKENS + COMPONENTS · LIVE
/ TYPE SCALE
Display--type-display · 96 / 100
Heading 1--type-h1 · 48 / 56
Body text--type-body · 16 / 24
/ COLOR PALETTE
#4AC2E2
--ab-cyan
PRIMARY
#A62767
--ab-magenta
EMPHASIS
#93A3B0
--ab-sage
MUTED
#1B3341
--ab-navy
SURFACE
+42%Avg Conversion Lift From UX/UI Engagements
~6–12 wkAvg Design System Build Timeline
100%Design Engagements That Use Component Systems
/ The UX/UI Reality

Pretty doesn’t ship.
Systems do.

Most design work in eCommerce stops at “looks good in Figma.” The brands that actually scale don’t have prettier screens — they have systematic design infrastructure: tokens that make every component consistent, patterns that make every page predictable, documentation that lets dev teams move fast without breaking the brand.

/ Most Agencies · Decoration

One beautiful screen. Then 200 screens that drift from the original because there’s no system tying them together.

~3 monthsbefore brand consistency breaks down
/ Act Bold · Infrastructure

One system. Tokens, components, patterns, and documentation that scale to 47 screens, 4,700 screens, and the next site refresh in 18 months.

~18 months+brand consistency holds across teams
The Difference: Decorative Design Optimizes The Screenshot. Infrastructure Design Optimizes The Next 12 Months Of Shipping.
67%
of eCommerce sites have inconsistent UI patterns across PDP, cart, and checkout.
Baymard Institute UX Benchmark · 2024
3–5×
faster shipping velocity when dev teams work from a component library.
Forrester Design System ROI Study · 2024
$18K
avg cost of a single brand-consistency cleanup when systematic design is skipped initially.
Act Bold Multi-Client Engagement Data · 2025
+42%
avg conversion lift when UX/UI is rebuilt with conversion-focused systematic design.
Act Bold UX/UI Engagement Cohort · 2025
/ The UX/UI Stack

Four pillars.
One conversion-ready system.

Every UX/UI engagement at Act Bold runs across four pillars — together they build the research foundation, the architectural structure, the visual system, and the operational documentation that makes design infrastructure rather than decoration.

01

UX Research & Discovery

The work that informs every subsequent design decision. User research, competitive analysis, analytics audit, heuristic evaluation, accessibility review — translated into specific design problems to solve, not just slides to present.

  • User interviews + usability testing (remote + moderated)
  • Analytics audit (GA4, Hotjar, FullStory, Heap)
  • Heuristic evaluation against Nielsen + Baymard criteria
  • Accessibility audit (WCAG 2.1 AA baseline)
02

Information Architecture

How the site is organized determines whether users find what they need or give up. Sitemap structures, navigation hierarchies, user flows, content models — all designed before a single pixel of visual design happens. IA wrong = visual design works against itself.

  • Sitemap + page-type taxonomy
  • User flow mapping (commerce + content)
  • Navigation system design (primary, secondary, mobile, footer)
  • Content model definition (page types, components, fields)
03

UI Design & Visual Direction

The visual layer — typography, color, spacing, imagery, motion — applied with systematic consistency across every screen. Brand expression that translates from screen to ad to email to packaging without losing coherence.

  • Typography system + hierarchy
  • Color system (primary, accent, surface, semantic)
  • Imagery + iconography direction
  • Motion + interaction design language
04

Design Systems & Component Libraries

The operational infrastructure that turns design from a series of one-off screens into a scalable engine. Token definitions, component libraries, documentation, and developer handoff specs — built in Figma with optional code-side parity in Storybook or equivalent.

  • Figma library (tokens, components, variants, documentation)
  • Component states (default, hover, active, disabled, loading, error)
  • Responsive behavior specs (breakpoints + adaptation rules)
  • Developer handoff (Storybook parity, Tokens Studio, design-to-code workflow)
/ The Conversion Stack

Design patterns that move the number.

Most UX/UI engagements optimize for “looks better.” Ours optimize for the conversion number. Here are the patterns that consistently move the needle on DTC + eCommerce conversion — applied systematically, measured rigorously, refined per brand.

/ Pattern 01

Sticky Mobile Add-to-Cart

Persistent CTA on mobile PDPs eliminates scroll-back friction. Particularly high-impact for high-AOV products where buyers research extensively before adding.

+12–24%
Mobile Add-to-Cart Rate
When to use
Any PDP with content below the fold
/ Pattern 02

Trust Signals Above the Fold

Strategic placement of reviews, badges, guarantees, and social proof within the first viewport — critical for new-customer conversion where brand trust hasn't been established.

+8–18%
First-Time-Buyer Conversion
When to use
PDPs where new traffic represents >40% of visitors
/ Pattern 03

Progressive Form Design

Replace 12-field signup forms with single-question progressive reveal. Reduces cognitive load, increases completion. Works across newsletter signup, account creation, and checkout flows.

+30–60%
Form Completion
When to use
Any form with 4+ fields where completion is the goal
/ Pattern 04

Anchored Image Gallery

PDP imagery anchored to the viewport on desktop while content scrolls beside it. Keeps the product visually present throughout consideration — impactful for fashion, furniture, jewelry.

+15–22%
PDP Engagement Time
When to use
Visually-driven product categories
/ Pattern 05

Cart-as-Step-One Checkout

Treat the cart page as the first step of checkout (not a separate confirmation page). Reduces clicks-to-purchase by 1-2 across most flows. Compounds with single-page checkout.

+6–14%
Checkout Completion
When to use
Standard eCommerce; especially sub-$200 AOV
/ Pattern 06

Native Review Integration

Reviews rendered as native DOM elements (not Yotpo/Stamped iframe widgets). Faster page load, better mobile experience, fully styleable to match brand. Often overlooked, compounding.

+18–35%
Review Section Engagement
When to use
Brands with 50+ reviews per top product

These aren’t theoretical best practices. They’re the patterns we’ve shipped across 40+ DTC engagements with measured impact on the conversion number.

/ UX/UI Case Studies

Three brands.
Three different design problems.

From multi-thousand-SKU information architecture to luxury rebrand UI — three brands that needed UX/UI to function as conversion infrastructure, not decoration.

IA + UI + DESIGN SYSTEM · ECOMMERCE (10K+ SKU)

Parts Place Inc

/ Multi-Thousand SKU IA + Conversion-First UI Program
+55%
Conversion Rate Lift Post-Redesign
−70%
Admin Time Reduction (Site Operations)
10K+
SKUs Restructured Into Coherent Taxonomy

The IA work alone paid for the entire engagement. They turned a chaotic catalog into something our customers could actually navigate — and our team could actually maintain.

See Case Study →
Parts Place Inc — client photography
UI + DESIGN SYSTEM · LUXURY OUTERWEAR

ML Furs

/ Luxury Brand UI + Design System Engagement
3×+
Organic Growth Post-Rebrand
Year-Round
Visual System That Sustained Seasonal Pivot
Since 2014
Design System Still in Production

They built us a design system in 2014 that we're still using. That's the test — does the system survive ten years and three pivots.

See Case Study →
ML Furs — client photography
UX RESEARCH + IA + UI · HOME GOODS

Confidential DTC Brand

/ Full UX Engagement — Research-Driven Redesign
−63%
Drop-off At The Identified Critical Step
+38%
Add-to-Cart Rate Across PDP Categories
+22 NPS
Post-Redesign Usability Score Lift

The research surfaced the actual problem in week two. We spent the next ten weeks solving it — and the conversion math finally moved.

See Case Study →
Confidential DTC Brand — client photography
/ Investment

Three ways to engage.

A fixed-scope sprint for focused work, a custom-scoped engagement for full builds, or an ongoing retainer for evolving sites — pick the shape that matches the problem, not the budget you happen to have.

Design Sprint
/ TIER 01

Design Sprint

Fixed-scope, fixed-price 2-week design sprint. For specific deliverables: checkout redesign, PDP optimization, design system audit, or a focused UX research project. Single deliverable, defined outcome.

  • 2-week timeline (10 working days)
  • Discovery + design + handoff in single engagement
  • Specific deliverable (audit / redesign / system audit)
  • Path to full project if expansion is needed
$7,500 / 2 weeks
FIXED PRICE · FIXED SCOPE
Talk to us →
Full Project · Design Phase
/ TIER 02

Full Project — Design Phase

Design phase of a full Web Build engagement (the parent service). Comprehensive UX research, complete IA + wireframes, full UI design, and design system + component library for entire site. Scoped per project based on site complexity and timeline.

Custom · SOW-scoped
SCOPED PER PROJECT
See Web Build pricing →
Design Retainer
/ TIER 03

Design Retainer

Ongoing design support for brands with an existing site that needs continuous evolution — new pages, landing pages, campaign assets, design system updates, component library extensions. Capacity-based, predictable monthly engagement.

  • 16 hours/month of design capacity (extends to all UX/UI work)
  • Routed through Web Retainer pricing
  • Component library + design system stewardship included
  • Monthly review + roadmap calibration
$2,500 / month
INCLUDED IN WEB RETAINER
Talk to us →
Month-to-Month (Retainer) · Fixed-Price (Sprint) · Scoped SOW (Project) · 30-Day Cancel · 10% Annual Discount
/ UX/UI Questions

Five questions worth a real answer.

UX vs UI scope, project timelines, brand-identity boundaries, what success measurement actually looks like, and design-to-dev handoff models.

UX (User Experience) is the architectural layer — how the site is organized, how users move through it, what decisions they're being asked to make, where friction lives in their flow. UI (User Interface) is the visual + interaction layer that gives that architecture a face — typography, color, motion, components. UX wrong = users can't find what they need regardless of how pretty it is. UI wrong = the site looks amateur and trust evaporates regardless of how well-architected the flow is. We do both, and we do them in sequence (UX first, UI second) because UI built on a broken UX is decoration on a foundation that won't hold weight.

Depends on the scope. A focused Design Sprint (single deliverable like a checkout redesign or design system audit) is 2 weeks fixed. A full project — comprehensive UX research, complete IA, full UI design, and design system build — typically runs 6-12 weeks for DTC and eCommerce sites in the $2M-$20M revenue range. Enterprise engagements (10K+ SKUs, multi-region) run longer. We scope timelines during discovery, not during the sales call — generic timelines from agencies that haven’t seen your site are sales theater, not project planning.

Either. Most engagements work with the existing brand identity — the visual system is already established, we're optimizing the digital expression of it (typography hierarchy, layout discipline, component consistency, conversion-pattern application). When a rebrand is part of the engagement, we run brand identity work as a separate phase before UX/UI — because UI built on an unresolved brand identity is just delayed redesign work. We can also work alongside an existing brand identity agency where one already exists.

Three layers stacked: (1) usability metrics from user testing — task completion rates, time-on-task, error rates, satisfaction scores — measured pre- and post-redesign; (2) conversion metrics from analytics — add-to-cart rate, checkout completion, form submission, page-level conversion — tracked against the baseline; (3) operational metrics from the design system — component reuse %, design-to-dev handoff time, brand-consistency rate across page types, time-to-ship new pages. We report all three so you see whether the work is improving the user, the conversion number, and the team velocity — not just whether the screens look better.

Both options work. We hand off to your dev team via Figma + Storybook + design tokens (typically using Tokens Studio for code-side parity), with full component documentation and developer handoff specs. Or we extend the engagement into Web Development and ship the build ourselves — particularly useful for full site rebuilds where the design and development phases need tight integration. Or we do hybrid: we design + build the foundational design system and core templates, then hand specific page builds off to your dev team using the system we built.

/ Let's Talk · UX/UI Design

Ready to build infrastructure?

Tell Act Bold about your current site, the conversion problems you’re hitting, and whether you have an existing design system to build on. We’ll send back a no-fluff UX heuristic audit covering structural issues, conversion friction points, and a recommended engagement path — within 48 hours.

info@actbold.comactbold.com30-Day Cancel · Month-to-Month